Sep 13 2009

The Idiot Box Substituted

Published by DDmom at 2:21 am under Conversations, Ddidi, Dlittle, Family, Internet and Kids, Parenting

When we moved to Bangalore less than a year back, the husband was pretty adamant on not buying the TV. The LH is a man of his own values, and adheres to them earnestly, no matter what the world makes of him. Me, on the other hand, lives by the rules, likes moderation and believes in balance.

 

Acknowledging the fact that me and the LH don’t converge on any said topic, and to save our kids from the constant dilemma, we made a conscious decision to let me have the final say on parenting issues. Not because I am the better parent(Hell no!, the husband is the epitome of patience, more well read and well traveled, all of which attribute to better decision making ), but simply because I am the more involved parent as far as providing consistent, predictable time with them and their day to day activities. And thus I self proclaim myself as knowing them better ;)

 

So, when the LH had declared that we won’t get TV, I was game for experimentation, convincing self that I could always find a reason and force him into to getting one if-and-when needed. D and Dlittle hardly watched TV while we were at our in-laws place, as they were used to watching pbskids in the bay area, and could not relate much to the programming here. When they did not seem to care for the existence of the idiot box, I cared less. While youtube serves me well for the likes of Tere mere beach mein, Google news and the morning papers serve their purpose of instilling the little worldly knowledge that I need.

 

It is close to a year now, and we have survived without the idiot box. We still don’t feel the necessity to have one.

 

However, the influence on kids, by taking extreme measures of not having the TV in the house Vs allowing restricted quality viewing, while 99.99 percent of the population we relate to has one, is the question of concern.

 

Allow me to digress here, for the only way I know to get my point across is by quoting happenings and analyzing the after effects. What made me choose this topic for the weekend post is something that happened the day before yesterday night. A good lot of our family and extended family kids(10+ years) are on twitter, we have successfully phased the younger ones out of facebook and orkut(Some had faked their age as 13, just to get a facebook account. I had written about Social Networking some time back and still believe that it is not a safer place for younger kids to hang out without parental monitoring). We got them on to twitter, some have even started blogging. I feel twitter is much more simpler and transparent and makes it is easy for us parents/guardians to keep a watch.
(My dear handful of readers, before you judge us to be a crazy internet addicted family. Let me tell you that our business revolves around social networking, we have 2 software engineers in the making, one JEE zone topper, all die hard fans of their chacha’s/maama’s bindas attitude on life life-is-short-do-only-what-you believe-in-and-what-gives-YOU-happiness and entrepreneurial capability and keep asking for fun projects to do. So, it is not entirely our fault that our family’s primary mode of communication has become direct messaging via twitter instead of phone. phew!).

 

Before I go on, let me first formally introduce my nephew to this blog. Babio, as Dlittle lovingly calls him, is my 13 year old nephew, a very very sweet kid, staying with us and studying here. Babio came into the office room asking if he could open a twitter account for his sisters. You guessed that right. An account for D and Dlittle. That’s when it hit me that I had taken a twitter account in D’s name in early 2007 and even tweeted one mere line. Call me nuts, I did it. And conveniently forgot about it. I opened up the twitter page and D was supremely excited to read her name there. In less than 2 minutes she demanded the page background be changed pink, to be made very colorful like a rainbow.

 

Then comes the defining moment, leading to this heavy duty post.

 

She spots her name on the browser url – http://twitter.com/hername, selects just her name using the mouse and asks –
If I type Dlittle’s name here, her page will come?

“P.A.G.E?”. You said PAGE?

When I told her that I had not created Dlittle’s twitter page yet, she says in these exact words.
Sign up, mumma. Sign up.

S.I.G.N U.P????

Where in the world did she get that? S.I.G.N. U.P. Still remains a mystery. When asked, she simply said, I was imagining about it. Whatever imagination has to do with knowing “sign up”.

One other time, Firefox crapped out and she refused to use Safari. Saying she only likes Firefox, the orange colored thingee. Yes, thingee. Nothing else.

Yet another time, madam was installing adobe plugin. When I happened to see it and asked what in the world she was doing, she says that the video will not come unless she does it. She just has to keep clicking the second button on the right and it will work after that.


Which brings me to these points to ponder. Are my kids getting more than the needed dosage of computer time? Have we unconsciously s u b s t i t u t e d computer time for TV time. If yes, is that a good or a bad thing? Should we continue without the TV, or should we get one for the heck of it. If we get one, with our ever increasing demand for time, will we be disciplined enough to restrict the timings? Will my kids feel left out when their friends discuss some popular TV character? Is that something to even care for?

 

It is not that we are completely deprived of movies and we plonk ourselves in front of the computer the minute we wake up. D hardly gets half an hour of computer time, 2 – 3 times a week. Every now and then, we get the projector from our office(thanks to owning office assets :) ), dvd’s and project the movie on the h.u.g.e wall we have in the living room. Spice it up with ice cream or popcorn, the kids have a blast. Idea is to make it a special once in a while event instead of a routine.

 

I don’t have answers, but I do believe that my kids would have sooner or later got into the internet/computer world, just based on the nature of our job. Based on them being exposed to a home office server, 3 laptops, big screen monitor and the likes. Based on us preferring the computer(internet) to communicate long distance. Based on them watching us running to google baba for anything and everything. (Seeing us printing maps, looking up directions before going out. Checking out restaurant reviews. The other day she asked me something , I said I am not sure. She says, type it in google, it will tell you).

 

So, are we going to acquire the idiot box or not? The dilemma continues!

You might also like..

Loading…

12 responses so far

12 Responses to “The Idiot Box Substituted”

  1. MNIAMMAon 14 Sep 2009 at 2:37 am

    It was a big question at our home too DDMOm “To buy or not to buy the IB”. We finally gave in and bought it last weekend though watching time is very restricted. About 1/2 to 1 hour a day. D is really amazing – ’signup, my page, thingee’ showing sure fire signs of a whizkid :)

    [Reply]

    DDmom Reply:

    @MNIAMMA, See, that’s what I am not sure of. Being able to restrict the timings, especially that now we have our 13 year old sports junkie nephew with us. Each of us wanting to watch half an hour of our favorite programme will end up in 3 hours of TV :)

    [Reply]

  2. Poppyon 14 Sep 2009 at 7:33 am

    Interesting this ! Now that my girl is growing up and using words like ‘Let it load’ ‘Download pannu’, ‘Click Ok’ etc :)

    I think the TV is waaaay safer than the internet. Even with the violence and the ads. But screen time (which includes TV and Computer) must be restricted. How much total screen time does D do? Mine does half hour of TV plus 15-20 minutes occasionally one of those applications on Computer (starfall or just painting on MS Paint, thanks for the barney link!)

    [Reply]

    DDmom Reply:

    @Poppy, No doubt on the fact that TV is much safer than the internet. I can at the least hear what they are watching and don’t have sit behind them all the time watching which site they are navigating to.
    But, the dilemma here is that having the TV might not necessarily reduce their exposure to computers. D gets about 1/2 hour of computer-time, and so far she mostly goes to pbskids – science kids and the likes. I was surprised when one day she said, lets make apple sauce and a chocolate cake. I learn’t it on pbskids. So far so good.
    Also, will they feel left out when their friends chatter about some TV character, is that even a matter of concern? Why think so far ahead, if she does, the vocal her will sure raise it :)

    [Reply]

  3. CAon 14 Sep 2009 at 3:25 pm

    I have to agree with Poppy … TV is much safer than internet. I am sure you are monitoring everything your daughter does on the computers …
    In our house, Cantaloupe who is all of 5 now is allowed about an hour of TV every day and this I am not very happy about. She is allowed only PBS station and I argue with BP almost everyday about allowing her almost an hour of TV time.
    She knows very little about computers so far (starfall, paint, potatoguy) and I am in no hurry to introduce her to the same …
    I think its wonderful that you guys are not so much TV crazy.

    [Reply]

    DDmom Reply:

    @CA, Agreed, TV is definitely safer than computers, as long you have control over the remote :) As I replied to poppy’s comment, in our case, I am not sure having TV will reduce computer-time.
    Let’s see for how much longer we can sustain this no-tv show..

    [Reply]

  4. Abhaon 15 Sep 2009 at 6:02 am

    well we have a TV, but no cable connection. we have a DVD player and about 300 DVDs of our fav and not so fav movies. sometimes we dont watch anything for days together and on others few hours in a row. Now Cubby insists on “Mowgi dekhenge” “elephant dekhenge” or “nemo dekhenge” and we give in every now and then.

    he is still too young for computers so that is left for another day! :)

    cheers!

    [Reply]

    DDmom Reply:

    @Abha, That might be what we would end up with. A TV with no cable connection :)

    [Reply]

  5. whatsinanameon 17 Sep 2009 at 5:50 am

    Well frankly, I think everything has plus and minus. Like Poppy says, I too believe TV is safer than net.
    The point is you cannot stop the peer pressure. It all depends on the kids how much they give into it. My younger daughter is 12 and only some 2 weeks back, I gave in to her demand to get her facebook profile done; her argument that “all” of her friends are on facebook. But I am keeping an eye on the activities.
    But how much of an “eye” can be kept on them? All we can do is give them good values and warn them about the big bad world and the safety measures. Rest is not under our control :(

    Atleast you have an option “not to have TV”. With my inlaws staying with us, I cant imagine life without SUN TV :(

    [Reply]

    DDmom Reply:

    @whatsinaname, I can understand the need of TV for in-laws.
    Regarding facebook, the biggest culprit is invitation to be friends by friends-friends, whom she might not know. One option could be to make her ask you before accepting any facebook invitation, or simply have her username/password until she is old enough and thick skinned to handle trolling. What i have noticed with my nephew is that they seem to be in some sort of peer pressure to have as-many friends. Some sort of internal competition, I have x friends, how many do you have kinds. Silly and sad, but they end up accepting invitation from any tom dick and harry. I have spotted some age inappropriate photos in his friends profile and that was one reason, we got him out. The deal is he can use facebook, but only with supervision.

    [Reply]

  6. utbtkidson 17 Sep 2009 at 9:16 pm

    I blogged abt this at http://utbtkids.com/2008/07/11/ourtube/ and http://utbtkids.com/2008/07/13/ourtube-contd/

    The key word is ‘moderation’. Looks like you are moderating it, but given the nature of your work, I am not surprised that they are nore attuned to the net.

    No biggie, cool it. May be you guys can design some kind of super duper parental control s/w where all contacts to your child’s internet social networking is moderated by you :) Think abt it, I am sure it will be a great hit and I am nice person, I will settle for just 10% royalty.

    [Reply]

    DDmom Reply:

    @utbtkids, You know B, he registered a domain to do just this long time back, must be about a year back. But with someone who gets 10 awesome ideas in a day, there is only so much you can do :)

    10% royalty sure done :)

    [Reply]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply